Research Backed
Positive growth.
Traditional matchmaking models, which frequently depend on self-reported personality inventories, have been shown in empirical studies to exhibit limitations in consistently fostering enduring, successful relationships. Our methodology transcends these limitations by delving into more fundamental aspects of human connection.
We employ a comprehensive suite of scientifically validated assessments, each meticulously designed and curated by our in-house neuroscientist. These instruments are engineered to probe beyond overt preferences, targeting the underlying values and behavioral patterns that are truly indicative of relational compatibility. Research in behavioral science and cognitive neuroscience consistently demonstrates that these often subconscious elements serve as significantly stronger predictors of both initial attraction and, critically, the long-term success and stability of a partnership. This rigorous, evidence-based approach ensures that our foundational data accurately reflects the intricate dynamics essential for profound human connection.
Evidence-based coaching (EBC) is a professional coaching approach that integrates insights from systematic research and scientific study, particularly from fields like psychology, adult learning, and communication. Unlike traditional coaching that might rely more on intuition or anecdotal experience, EBC grounds its methodologies in empirically supported theories and models. This ensures that the strategies and interventions employed are not merely popular trends but have a demonstrated likelihood of leading to positive and sustainable change. Coaches practicing EBC continuously evaluate their methods, remain updated on the latest research, and adapt their approach to the unique needs and context of each client, striving for a balance between best available knowledge, their own expertise, and unique client context.
In the realm of relationship coaching, an emphasis on evidence-based practices is particularly crucial due to the complexity and emotional sensitivity inherent in interpersonal dynamics. EBC for relationships draws upon research in areas such as attachment theory, conflict resolution, communication styles, and emotional intelligence. For instance, techniques like active listening, “I” statements, and specific conflict management strategies are not just good ideas, but are backed by studies on what fosters healthy and resilient relationships. This structured, yet flexible, approach helps individuals and couples gain clarity on their relationship goals, develop effective communication and problem-solving skills, and build a stronger, more intimate connection based on proven principles.
Our algorithm is data-driven, leveraging information from each of our scientifically validated assessments. These assessments extend beyond superficial preferences, delving into fundamental aspects of an individual’s psychological makeup, including their core values, behavioral patterns, and relationship paradigms. The algorithm then accounts for each data point, identifying deep-seated commonalities and complementary differences that statistically correlate with strong, enduring relationships.
Furthermore, it is recognized that while data-driven insights are crucial, the intricacies of human connection often transcend quantifiable metrics. Therefore, the algorithm’s output is subjected to the discerning expertise of our dedicated matchmaking team. This review incorporates a nuanced understanding of interpersonal dynamics, adding an invaluable layer of qualitative insight and expert intuition, ensuring that each presented match is not merely statistically sound, but also possesses a genuine potential for meaningful connection.
The initial three-month period following a match is recognized as a critically formative stage in the development of a new relationship. During this phase, foundational elements of connection, mutual understanding, and shared experience are established, influencing the trajectory and longevity of the partnership.
To help you make the most of this crucial period, we provide a series of predetermined dates. Each encounter is designed to facilitate specific aspects of closeness development and further compatibility validation. These dates are crafted and ordered based on research results to help your relationship progress in a playful and engaging way, with each one focusing on key aspects of attraction, closeness, and long-term success.
Research background
Ackison, C. B. (2008). Strengthening couples through outdoor relationship education (score): An Experiential Marital Group Intervention (dissertation). Strengthening Couples through Outdoor Relationship Education (SCORE): an experiential marital group intervention.
Admin. (2025, February 25). The 4 pillars of evidenced-based coaching. Fielding Graduate University. https://www.fielding.edu/the-4-pillars-of-evidenced-based-coaching/
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.273
Brown, B., & Perel, E. (2021, September 22). Brené with Esther Perel on Partnerships, Patterns, and Paradoxical Relationships. Unlocking Us Podcast. other.
Buston, P. M., & Emlen, S. T. (2003). Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in western society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 8805–8810. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1533220100
Cortes, K., Britton, E., Holmes, J. G., & Scholer, A. A. (2020). Our adventures make me feel secure: Novel activities boost relationship satisfaction through felt security. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 89, 103992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103992
Foulk, T. A., & Venkataramani, V. (2023, November 8). Research: How creative collaboration can strengthen relationships. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2023/11/research-how-creative-collaboration-can-strengthen-relationships
Foulk, T. A., Venkataramani, V., Cao, R., & Krishnan, S. (2022). Thinking outside the box helps build social connections: The role of creative mindsets in reducing daily rudeness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 171, 104167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104167
Freeman, H., Simons, J., & Benson, N. F. (2023). Romantic duration, relationship quality, and attachment insecurity among dating couples. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010856
González-Ortega, E., Vicario-Molina, I., Orgaz Baz, B., & Fuertes Martín, A. (2017). The influence of romantic attachment style matching and combination on conflict resolution and relationship quality among romantic couples. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14(Supplement_4b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.04.513
Gordon, N. R. (2019). Cooking with couples: A grounded theory study on the relational aspects found in the cooking interactions of couples (dissertation). Cooking with couples: a grounded theory study on the relational aspects found in the cooking interactions of couples.
Herz, R. S., & Inzlicht, M. (2002). Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(5), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00095-8
Ihara, Y., Aoki, K., Tokunaga, K., Takahashi, K., & Juji, T. (2000). Hla and human mate choice. tests on Japanese couples. Anthropological Science, 108(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1537/ase.108.199
Livingston, J. A. (1999). Something old and something new: Love, creativity, and the enduring relationship. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 63(1), 40–52.
MC, P. S. (2024, April 19). The power of I statements: Communicating effectively. Well Beings Counselling. https://wellbeingscounselling.ca/the-power-of-i-statements/
McGrath, R. E., & Wallace, N. (2019). Cross-validation of the Via Inventory of strengths-revised and its short forms. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1705465
Muise, A., Harasymchuk, C., Day, L. C., Bacev-Giles, C., Gere, J., & Impett, E. A. (2019). Broadening your horizons: Self-expanding activities promote desire and satisfaction in established romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000148
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003
Perel, E. (2006). Mating in captivity: Reconciling the Erotic & The Domestic. Harper Audio.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association ; Oxford University Press.
Roberts, S. C., Gosling, L. M., Carter, V., & Petrie, M. (2008). MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1652), 2715–2722. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0825
Ryan, N. (2024, October 15). Knowledge vs. wisdom ~ the need for evidence-based coaching in China. choice, the magazine of professional coaching. https://choice-online.com/knowledge-vs-wisdom/
Taniguchi, S. T., Freeman, P. A., Taylor, S., & Malcarne, B. (2006). A study of married couples’ perceptions of marital satisfaction in outdoor recreation. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(3), 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590602800309
Visser, L., Pat-El, R., Lataster, J., van Lankveld, J., & Jacobs, N. (2025). The relation between big five personality traits and relationship formation through matchmaking. Psychology International, 7(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7020052
What-is-evidence-based-coaching-key-competencies-every-i-O-psychology-professional-should-know. Walden University. (n.d.). https://www.waldenu.edu/programs/psychology/resource/what-is-evidence-based-coaching-key-competencies-every-i-o-psychology-professional-should-know
Williams, M. N., & Apicella, C. L. (2023). Do humans agree on which body odors are attractive, similar to the agreement observed when rating faces and voices? Evolution and Human Behavior, 44(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.02.002